GMDSS Communication Competency in the Age of Digital Transformation: A Needs Analysis of Maritime English Proficiency Among Indonesian Deck Officer Candidates
Keywords:
GMDSS; Maritime English; needs analysis; digital transformation; deck officer candidatesAbstract
The ongoing modernization of the Global Maritime Distress and Safety System (GMDSS) toward digital and satellite-based communication platforms has substantially intensified the Maritime English proficiency demands placed upon deck officer candidates worldwide. Despite this transformation, empirical needs analysis research specifically addressing the linguistic and communicative competency requirements of Indonesian seafarers in GMDSS digital contexts remains critically absent from the scholarly literature. This study investigates the Maritime English communication competency needs of Indonesian deck officer candidates at Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Pelayaran (STIP) Jakarta in relation to the evolving discourse demands of modernized GMDSS operation. Employing a qualitative needs analysis design, data were generated through semi-structured interviews with deck cadets, Maritime English lecturers, and senior maritime communication practitioners, supplemented by document analysis of GMDSS training materials and the IMO's modernized GMDSS regulatory framework. Analysis proceeded through thematic analysis, cross-group comparison, and narrative synthesis. Findings reveal substantial and systematic gaps between cadets' current Maritime English communicative competence and the proficiency levels required for confident and safe GMDSS digital communication, particularly in distress message formulation, digital selective calling interpretation, and MF/HF digital communication protocols. The study argues for a needs-responsive redesign of GMDSS-integrated Maritime English curricula grounded in genre-based and communicative language teaching principles, with direct implications for STCW-aligned training policy and maritime education practice.
References
Biber, D., & Conrad, S. (2009). Register, genre, and style. Cambridge University Press.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Dudley-Evans, T., & St. John, M. J. (1998). Developments in English for specific purposes: A multi-disciplinary approach. Cambridge University Press.
Gee, J. P. (2012). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses (4th ed.). Routledge.
Hutchinson, T., & Waters, A. (1987). English for specific purposes: A learning-centred approach. Cambridge University Press.
Hyland, K. (2006). English for academic purposes: An advanced resource book. Routledge.
International Maritime Organization. (2001). IMO Standard Marine Communication Phrases (SMCP). IMO Publishing.
International Maritime Organization. (2011). STCW: Including 2010 Manila Amendments. IMO Publishing.
International Maritime Organization. (2019). Modernization of the Global Maritime Distress and Safety System (GMDSS): Amendments to SOLAS Chapter IV and related instruments (MSC.99(73)). IMO Publishing.
Lewkowicz, J., & Forey, G. (2020). Maritime English in a changing world: Challenges and new directions. English for Specific Purposes, 58, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2019.09.001
Munby, J. (1978). Communicative syllabus design. Cambridge University Press.
Porathe, T. (2012). Human factors issues with ECDIS usability. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 56(1), 1212–1216. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071181312561241
Pritchard, B. (2003). Maritime communication and the Standard Marine Communication Phrases. In Proceedings of the International Maritime English Conference (IMEC 15). World Maritime University.
Pyne, R., & Koester, T. (2005). Identifying sources of error and accident in maritime environments. Cognition, Technology & Work, 7(4), 204–210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-005-0198-0
Simanjuntak, M. B. (2025). Multiliteracy framework for Maritime English communication: Pedagogical implications for Indonesian seafarer education. TransNav: The International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, 19(4). https://doi.org/10.12716/1001.19.04.14
Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge University Press.
Trenkner, P. (2004). Maritime English: Where are we going? In Proceedings of the International Maritime English Conference (IMEC 16). World Maritime University.
West, R. (1994). Needs analysis in language teaching. Language Teaching, 27(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444800007518
