Alternative Maritime Fuels Adoption in Southeast Asian Shipping: Barriers, Opportunities, and Regulatory Framework Analysis

Authors

  • Sahar Saleh Maritime Institute, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Pelayaran Jakarta, North Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Eriza I. Ulmi Maritime Institute, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Pelayaran Jakarta, North Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Fitri Mulyana Maritime Institute, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Pelayaran Jakarta, North Jakarta, Indonesia

Keywords:

Alternative maritime fuels; decarbonization; Southeast Asian shipping; regulatory frameworks; infrastructure barriers

Abstract

This research investigates stakeholder perspectives on alternative maritime fuel adoption barriers, opportunities, and regulatory frameworks within Southeast Asian shipping contexts. Employing qualitative-dominant mixed methods, the study gathered insights through Focus Group Discussions, interviews, and surveys with thirty-eight participants comprising maritime students, lecturers, and veteran practitioners at Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Pelayaran Jakarta. Thematic analysis revealed substantial adoption barriers dominated by infrastructure inadequacy (28%) and economic competitiveness challenges (26%), with significant regulatory gaps particularly in financial incentive mechanisms (gap score: 2.9/5.0). Comparative fuel pathway assessment identified liquefied natural gas as most viable near-term alternative (overall score: 3.9/5.0) despite limitations as transitional fuel, while zero-carbon alternatives including ammonia (2.7/5.0) and hydrogen (2.5/5.0) face substantial technical, infrastructural, and economic challenges. Overall regulatory adequacy (2.49/5.0) falls substantially below stakeholder-perceived importance (4.55/5.0), producing a regulatory gap of 2.06 points. Findings emphasize need for integrated strategies combining coordinated infrastructure development, substantial financial support mechanisms, regulatory harmonization, and systematic workforce development accelerating fuel transitions toward decarbonization objectives.

References

Al-Breiki, M., & Bicer, Y. (2021). Comparative life cycle assessment of sustainable energy carriers including production, storage, overseas transport and utilization. Journal of Cleaner Production, 279, 123481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123481

Balcombe, P., Brierley, J., Lewis, C., Skatvedt, L., Speirs, J., Hawkes, A., & Staffell, I. (2019). How to decarbonise international shipping: Options for fuels, technologies and policies. Energy Conversion and Management, 182, 72-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2018.12.080

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Hansson, J., Brynolf, S., Fridell, E., & Lehtveer, M. (2020). The potential role of ammonia as marine fuel—Based on energy systems modeling and multi-criteria decision analysis. Sustainability, 12(8), 3265. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12083265

Kumar, R. (2019). Research methodology: A step-by-step guide for beginners (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-30

How to Cite

Sahar Saleh, Eriza I. Ulmi, & Fitri Mulyana. (2026). Alternative Maritime Fuels Adoption in Southeast Asian Shipping: Barriers, Opportunities, and Regulatory Framework Analysis. Journal of Maritime Studies and Management, 2(1), 55–70. Retrieved from https://jurnal.poltekpelsulut.ac.id/index.php/jmsm/article/view/158

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.