Marine Pollution Prevention and Response Effectiveness: MARPOL Implementation in Indonesian Territorial Waters and Strategic Straits

Authors

  • Sahar Saleh Maritime Institute, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Pelayaran Jakarta, North Jakarta, Indonesia

Keywords:

MARPOL; marine pollution; Indonesian waters; environmental enforcement; maritime sustainability

Abstract

Indonesia's territorial waters, encompassing the world's most strategically significant maritime chokepoints including the Malacca, Sunda, and Lombok Straits, face acute and escalating marine pollution threats from the dense vessel traffic that transits these corridors daily. This study evaluates the effectiveness of MARPOL Annex I–VI compliance enforcement in Indonesian waters, identifying systemic implementation gaps and proposing an optimized enforcement and early warning response model. Employing a qualitative research design with thematic analysis and documentary review, the study engaged marine environmental inspectors, port state control officers, maritime law academics, and environmental scientists as primary respondents. Findings reveal an overall MARPOL implementation effectiveness composite score of 3.89 out of 5.00, with Annex I (oil pollution) and Annex VI (air pollution) enforcement identified as the most critically deficient implementation domains. The research demonstrates that Indonesian MARPOL enforcement is constrained by inspection capacity limitations, inter-agency coordination failures, and inadequate pollution response infrastructure across outer island port jurisdictions. The study contributes an enforcement optimization model and early warning pollution response system framework for Indonesian maritime environmental governance, with direct implications for maritime professional education at STIP Jakarta.

References

Amorim, L. M., Costa, J. L., Costa, A. C., Botelho, A. Z., & Torres, P. (2024). Unveiling microplastic abundance and distribution in an oceanic island: Offshore depository or local pollution indicator. Sustainability, 16(10), 4103. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16104103

Bilal, A., Xiao-ping, L., Nanli, Z., Sharma, R., & Jahanger, A. (2021). Green technology innovation, globalization, and CO2 emissions: Recent insights from the OBOR economies. Sustainability, 14(1), 236. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14010236

Caldas, P., Pedro, M. I., & Marques, R. C. (2024). An assessment of container seaport efficiency determinants. Sustainability, 16(11), 4427. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16114427

Caldeirinha, V., Felício, J. A., Pinho, T., & Rodrigues, R. (2024). Fuzzy-set QCA on performance and sustainability determinants of ports supporting floating offshore wind farms. Sustainability, 16(7), 2947. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16072947

Chae, G.-Y., An, S.-H., & Lee, C.-Y. (2021). Demand forecasting for liquified natural gas bunkering by country and region using meta-analysis and artificial intelligence. Sustainability, 13(16), 9058. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13169058

Du, S., Zhang, H. S., & Kong, Y. (2023). Sustainability implications of the Arctic shipping route for Shanghai port logistics in the post-pandemic era. Sustainability, 15(22), 16017. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152216017

Jian-ping, S., Fang, C., Chen, Z., & Chen, G. (2021). Regional cooperation in marine plastic waste cleanup in the South China Sea region. Sustainability, 13(16), 9221. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13169221

Kim, S.-K., Choi, S., & Kim, C. (2021). The framework for measuring port resilience in Korean port case. Sustainability, 13(21), 11883. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132111883

Liao, Y.-H., & Lee, H.-S. (2023). Using a directional distance function to measure the environmental efficiency of international liner shipping companies and assess regulatory impact. Sustainability, 15(4), 3821. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043821

Mwendapole, M. J., & Jin, Z. (2021). Evaluation of seaport service quality in Tanzania: From the Dar Es Salaam seaport perspective. Sustainability, 13(18), 10076. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131810076

Paridaens, H., & Notteboom, T. (2021). National integrated maritime policies (IMP): Vision formulation, regional embeddedness, and institutional attributes for effective policy integration. Sustainability, 13(17), 9557. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13179557

Pian, F., Xu, L., Chen, Y., & Lee, S.-H. (2020). Global emission taxes and port privatization policies under international competition. Sustainability, 12(16), 6595. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12166595

Qi, J., Wang, S., & Zheng, J. (2022). Shore power deployment problem — A case study of a Chinese container shipping network. Sustainability, 14(11), 6928. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14116928

Zhang, W., Zhang, Y., & Qiao, W. (2022). Risk scenario evaluation for intelligent ships by mapping hierarchical holographic modeling into risk filtering, ranking and management. Sustainability, 14(4), 2103. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14042103

Zhou, K., Yuan, X., Guo, Z., Wu, J., & Li, R. (2024). Research on sustainable port: Evaluation of green port policies on China's coasts. Sustainability, 16(10), 4017. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16104017

Downloads

Published

2026-03-01

How to Cite

Sahar Saleh. (2026). Marine Pollution Prevention and Response Effectiveness: MARPOL Implementation in Indonesian Territorial Waters and Strategic Straits. Marine Transport Management and Logistics Journal, 2(1), 64–73. Retrieved from https://jurnal.poltekpelsulut.ac.id/index.php/Transport/article/view/282

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.