Autonomous Vessel Technology Adoption in Southeast Asian Shipping: Readiness Assessment, Regulatory Gaps, and Strategic Pathways

Authors

  • Saidal Siburian Maritime Institute, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Pelayaran Jakarta, North Jakarta, Indonesia

Keywords:

autonomous vessels; MASS; Southeast Asia; maritime regulation; technology adoption

Abstract

The emergence of Maritime Autonomous Surface Ships (MASS) represents the most disruptive technological paradigm shift in maritime operations since the transition from sail to steam, yet Southeast Asian maritime nations — including Indonesia — remain substantially unprepared to integrate autonomous vessel technologies within their regulatory, port infrastructure, and maritime education frameworks. This study conducts the first systematic readiness assessment of Southeast Asian ports, shipping companies, and maritime regulatory authorities for autonomous vessel integration, identifying critical regulatory gaps and proposing a phased adoption roadmap. Employing a qualitative research design with thematic and comparative analysis, the study engaged autonomous vessel technology specialists, port operations directors, maritime regulators, and maritime academics across five Southeast Asian nations as primary respondents. Findings reveal an overall MASS readiness composite score of 3.72 out of 5.00 — indicating moderate readiness — with regulatory framework development and port infrastructure adaptation identified as the most critical gap domains. The study contributes a MASS readiness index tool and regional policy roadmap for ASEAN maritime autonomous technology adoption, with direct implications for maritime professional education and regional maritime governance.

References

Bilal, A., Xiao-ping, L., Nanli, Z., Sharma, R., & Jahanger, A. (2021). Green technology innovation, globalization, and CO2 emissions: Recent insights from the OBOR economies. Sustainability, 14(1), 236. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14010236

Caldas, P., Pedro, M. I., & Marques, R. C. (2024). An assessment of container seaport efficiency determinants. Sustainability, 16(11), 4427. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16114427

Caldeirinha, V., Felício, J. A., Pinho, T., & Rodrigues, R. (2024). Fuzzy-set QCA on performance and sustainability determinants of ports supporting floating offshore wind farms. Sustainability, 16(7), 2947. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16072947

Chae, G.-Y., An, S.-H., & Lee, C.-Y. (2021). Demand forecasting for liquified natural gas bunkering by country and region using meta-analysis and artificial intelligence. Sustainability, 13(16), 9058. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13169058

Du, S., Zhang, H. S., & Kong, Y. (2023). Sustainability implications of the Arctic shipping route for Shanghai port logistics in the post-pandemic era. Sustainability, 15(22), 16017. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152216017

Jian-ping, S., Fang, C., Chen, Z., & Chen, G. (2021). Regional cooperation in marine plastic waste cleanup in the South China Sea region. Sustainability, 13(16), 9221. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13169221

Kim, B., Kim, G., & Kang, M.-H. (2022). Study on comparing the performance of fully automated container terminals during the COVID-19 pandemic. Sustainability, 14(15), 9415. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14159415

Kim, S.-K., Choi, S., & Kim, C. (2021). The framework for measuring port resilience in Korean port case. Sustainability, 13(21), 11883. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132111883

Liao, Y.-H., & Lee, H.-S. (2023). Using a directional distance function to measure the environmental efficiency of international liner shipping companies and assess regulatory impact. Sustainability, 15(4), 3821. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043821

Mwendapole, M. J., & Jin, Z. (2021). Evaluation of seaport service quality in Tanzania: From the Dar Es Salaam seaport perspective. Sustainability, 13(18), 10076. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131810076

Paridaens, H., & Notteboom, T. (2021). National integrated maritime policies (IMP): Vision formulation, regional embeddedness, and institutional attributes for effective policy integration. Sustainability, 13(17), 9557. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13179557

Pian, F., Xu, L., Chen, Y., & Lee, S.-H. (2020). Global emission taxes and port privatization policies under international competition. Sustainability, 12(16), 6595. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12166595

Qi, J., Wang, S., & Zheng, J. (2022). Shore power deployment problem — A case study of a Chinese container shipping network. Sustainability, 14(11), 6928. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14116928

Zhang, W., Zhang, Y., & Qiao, W. (2022). Risk scenario evaluation for intelligent ships by mapping hierarchical holographic modeling into risk filtering, ranking and management. Sustainability, 14(4), 2103. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14042103

Zhu, J., Yan, W., He, J., Hafeez, M., & Sohail, S. (2024). Exploring the convergence of ICT, digital financial inclusion, environmental pressures, and free trade and their significance in driving sustainable green investment initiatives under carbon neutrality targets. Heliyon, 10(11), e31102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31102

Downloads

Published

2026-03-01

How to Cite

Saidal Siburian. (2026). Autonomous Vessel Technology Adoption in Southeast Asian Shipping: Readiness Assessment, Regulatory Gaps, and Strategic Pathways. Marine Transport Management and Logistics Journal, 2(1), 55–63. Retrieved from https://jurnal.poltekpelsulut.ac.id/index.php/Transport/article/view/281